Neurips acceptance rate. ICLR mean acceptance rate, last 5 years: 30%.

Neurips acceptance rate within each tier. NeurIPS mean Feb 26, 2021 · Closing ceremony NIPS 2017 | Image by Author. Small conferences in systems like PACT for example, receive few hundreds, but end up with a 20% acceptance rate. 2024; NeurIPS 2024: Guangji Bai, Yijiang Li, Chen Ling, Kibaek Kim, and Liang Zhao. even though we know the rejection rate of these conferences is Dec 27, 2022 · When answering Q1, authors were informed that the acceptance rate at NeurIPS over the last 4 years had been about 21%. 2% to 49. Extending Conference-Acceptance-Rate with larger coverage and more information, est. Yes, attendees at the opening ceremony get to hear that the acceptance rate had gone down from 51. 1%. 46%. NIPS 2014 The Twenty-Eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Apr 10, 2023 · Those numbers are in the same ballpark as conferences such as NeurIPS and ICLR. Acceptance rates for the major AI conferences. Conferences often provide statistics for a particular year, presenting the information about the acceptance rate, diversity, geographical and topic distribution, etc. Users share their opinions and experiences on how difficult it is to get a paper accepted at NeurIPS workshops, compared to the main track of the conference. The reviewing standards were again set very high, and the process involved a set of specific attention points, such as the impact and documentation quality of datasets, the reproducibility of benchmarks, as well as ethics, and long-term accessibility. min/max/mean/std: These calculations are based on the R. For ACL and EMNLP, papers are accepted to either the main proceedings or the Findings based on their perceived impact. Jun 3, 2020 · Acceptance rate derives from this. They also compare the benefits and drawbacks of workshops and conferences for publication and visibility. © Speculative decoding usually introduces a draft model to assist the base LLM where the draft model produces drafts and the base LLM verifies the draft for acceptance or rejection. The acceptance rate at NeurIPS 2021 turned out to be 25. 9% (678/3240) (40 orals, 112 spotlights and 526 posters)-NeurIPS’18: 20. Find out the paper acceptance rate, reviewers, invited speakers, awards, and other facts and figures. Jan 2020. UIST mean acceptance rate, last 5 years: 24%. Accept Precision CHI mean acceptance rate, last 5 years: 25%. Dec 10, 2024 · NeurIPS will continue to build on its LLM Policy Reviews for 2025. Please explore the list of accepted papers . The random baseline for this acceptance rate is 37. ML: Machine learning. 6: Marginally above acceptance threshold; 5: Marginally below acceptance threshold; 4: Ok but not good enough - rejection; 3: Clear rejection; 2: Strong rejection; 1: Trivial or wrong; Confidence score. The general machine learning conferences, such as NeurIPS, AAAI, IJCAI, ICLR, ICML, may have acceptance rates below 15% (see a list of recent acceptance rates). The overall statistics (average accepted rating) match up very well with NeurIPS 2019 data, so I suspect it should be a reasonable proxy for NeurIPS 2020 data. Aug 4, 2021 · NeurIPS’14: 24. Avg. Five USC papers were selected for spotlights, with an acceptance rate of 3%. For ICDM, TPDL, and PRICAI, papers are accepted as either long paper or short paper based on their quality. 8% (1011/4856) (30 orals, 168 spotlights and 813 posters)-NeurIPS’19: 21. 8%. Statistics and Visualization of acceptance rate, main keyword of NeurIPS 2020 accepted papers - hoya012/NeurIPS-2020-Paper-Statistics Nov 27, 2024 · When answering Q1, authors were informed that the acceptance rate at NeurIPS over the last 4 years had been about 21%. LICS mean acceptance rate, last 5 years: 39%. Nov 25, 2022 · The acceptance rate was 36. The authors’ responses had a nearly three-fold overestimate, with a median prediction of 70%. As a result, the papers in these conferences tend not to be very diverse, and it may take several rounds to get a paper accepted. Withdraw (in Table) may also include papers that were initially accepted but were later withdrawn by the authors. Usually, this is given for only that particular year, or perhaps up to a few years back. So I don't think it has anything to do with the number of submissions. 7% (414/1678)-NeurIPS’15: 21. 1% (1428/6743) (36 orals, 164 spotlights and 1228 posters)-NeurIPS’20 NeurIPS 2023 paper acceptance results are supposed to be released at 8 pm (CDT) on September 21. To be fair there are meetings (like NeurIPS) that have huge attendance and low acceptance rates (~20%). Choices: 5: You are absolutely certain about your assessment. Therefore, a NIPS signal processing paper should be more significant than the average ICASSP paper. Rates: Status Rate = #Status Occurrence / #Total. Widespread AI-Assisted Peer Reviews Boost Paper Scores and Acceptance Rates, 2024. Sep 12, 2023 · Such lightweight reviewing is more lenient, only rejecting poor or off-topic submissions, corresponding to a very high acceptance rate. In this framework, the final inference speed is decided by the decoding speed of the draft model and the acceptance rate of the draft provided by the draft model. For KDD and TheWebConf (formerly known as WWW), only the papers from research track are counted. For ICDM, submissions of short paper and those of long paper are in the same session and the decision of the paper type is made according to its quality. Three USC papers were selected for oral presentations, with an acceptance rate of less than 1%. 8%, accepted. Of course, this model can't take into account your specific situation, so don't read too much into it :) Also, if you're trying out of distribution reviews, no guarantees about their Also, NeurIPS's acceptance rates were still very low when the number of submissions was comparable to ICASSP today. 9% (403/1838)-NeurIPS’16: 23. "SparseLLM: Towards Global Pruning of Pre-trained Language Model", Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2024), acceptance rate: 25. 5% disagreement, so this is a 31% relative improvement (with a fairly large confidence interval given the small sample size). Please provide a "confidence score" for your assessment of this submission. ICML mean acceptance rate, last 5 years: 23%. CAV mean acceptance rate, last 5 years: 20%. ICLR mean acceptance rate, last 5 years: 30%. 1% (1428/6743) (36 orals, 164 spotlights and 1228 posters)-NeurIPS’20 Rates: Status Rate = #Status Occurrence / #Total. Hardware Technology Nov 27, 2022 · When answering Q1, authors were informed that the acceptance rate at NeurIPS over the last 4 years had been about 21%. Dec 8, 2021 · The acceptance rate was 25% for duplicated papers—a bit higher than the overall 2014 acceptance rate. 6% (569/2403)-NeurIPS’17: 20. But that simply reflects the success of publicity efforts. https: Rates: Status Rate = #Status Occurrence / #Total. The quality bar for NIPS is higher than those of a typical signal processing conference (such as ICASSP or ICIP): the NIPS papers are 30% longer, the reviews are more detailed, and the acceptance rate is about half. Learn about the 37th Annual Conference of Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) held in New Orleans, USA in December 2023. Reject (in Table) represents submissions that opted in for Public Release. . Dec 6, 2021 · NeurIPS is one the top conferences in machine learning and artificial intelligence research in the world, with an overall acceptance rate of 26%. The other answers elaborate well on the reasons for acceptance rates being low, but I would recommend you not focus on these numbers but instead on whether your advisor's students publish there regularly, as suggested in Captain Emacs's answer. Detailed reviews are more valuable to authors but place more burden on reviewers and can be less practical for larger workshops to provide reviews of consistent quality. Logic: Logic & verification. wfhwnkw rjlk nufxb dtkttgmj ekthbucm flxw egbw rzo sgco zewg